Web Survey Bibliography
Language: spanish
In a 2x2x2x2 factorial (quasi-)experimental design it was investigated whether administration mode (Internet versus paper-andpencil), anonymity, voluntariness, and age would influence answering behavior in a newly designed short-format employee survey. Employees in one complete section (N=655) of a large Swiss company were randomly assigned to conditions and invited to participate in the survey. Overall, 318 employees responded, with lower return rates for anonymous and for voluntary conditions: anonymous & voluntary 31% return vs. less anonymous & less voluntary 58% return, with other conditions in-between. There was also a tendency for differences in dropout. Voluntariness had a significant effect on response times, a dependent measure that could be applied in the Internet condition only.
Age and anonymity were shown to have a significant influence on the expression of job satisfaction; voluntariness and administration mode showed tendencies to moderate these influences. Effects of anonymity were shown to be stronger for participants who chose to reveal even less information about themselves by leaving questions with identifying content unanswered. Results are in line with the strategic aspect of the Social Identity model of Deindividuation Effects (SIDE). Methods and applications used in developing and administering the employee survey and in analyzing the data will be presented.
En este estudio, se ha investigado a través de un diseño factorial cuasi-experimental (factorial 2x2x2x2) la influencia de los factores “forma de administración del cuestionario” (internet vs papel), “anonimato”, “voluntariedad” y “edad” en las conductas de respuesta de un cuestionario de corta duración a empleados de una empresa. La muestra de empleados (N=655) invitados a participar fue seleccionada aleatoriamente de un departamento de una corporación de gran tamaño en Suiza. En total, se recogieron 318 cuestionarios completados y se detectó que aquellos con condiciones más anónimas y de carácter más voluntario obtuvieron un 31% de tasa de respuesta frente a un 58% en aquellos menos anónimos y voluntarios. Asimismo se observaron influencias de estas variables en la tasa de abandono de los cuestionarios. El grado de voluntariedad del cuestionario tuvo un efecto significativo en los tiempos de respuesta, siendo esta última una medida independiente que sólo se pudo obtener en el caso de aquellos que fueron rellenados por internet. La edad y el anonimato también influyeron de forma significativa en la respuesta sobre satisfacción laboral; por otro lado las variables voluntariedad y modo de administración del cuestionario no mostraban tanta influencia en este tipo de preguntas. Los efectos del anonimato eran mayores para aquellos participantes que eligieron dar menos información personal dejando algunas respuestas con datos de identificación sin responder. Los resultados concuerdan con el aspecto estratégico del modelo de Identidad Social de los efectos de Desindividualización (SIDE). A continuación se muestran los métodos y aplicaciones utilizadas para desarrollar y administrar la encuesta a los empleados y las formas de análisis de los datos obtenidos.
Authors homepage (full text)
Web survey bibliography - 2006 (98)
- Adult gadget ownership over time (2006-2012); 2012
- Dutch Online Panel Comparison Study (NOPVO); 2006; R. van Ossenbruggen; T. Vonk; P. Willems
- Migration Watch: an Internet survey to monitor spring migration in Britain and Ireland; 2006; Baillie, S. R., Balmer, D. E., Downie, I. S., Wright, K. H. M.
- Substance use and sexual behaviours of Japanese men who have sex with men: A nationwide internet survey...; 2006; Hidaka, Y., Ichikawa, S., Koyano, J., Urao, M., Yasuo, T., Kimura, H., Kihara, M., Ono-Kihara, M.
- Telephone versus Face-to-Face Interviewing: Mode Effects on Data Quality and Likely Causes. Report...; 2006; Jaeckle, A., Lynn, P., Roberts, C.,
- DADOS-Survey: an open-source application for CHERRIES-compliant Web surveys; 2006; Shah, A., Jacobs, D. O., Martins, H., Harker, M., Menezes, A., Harker, M., McCready, M., Pietrobon,...
- Snowball Sampling ; 2006; Berg, S.
- Introduction nonresponse bias in household surveys ; 2006; Singer, E.
- Essential Steps for Web Surveys: A Guide to Designing, Administering and Utilizing Web Surveys for University...; 2006; Cheskis-Gold, R., Loescher, R., Shepard-Rabadam, E., Carroll, B.
- Don't make me think: a common sense approach to web usability; 2006; Krug, S.
- The use of an Internet-based Ask the Doctor Service involving family physicians: evaluation by a web...; 2006; Umefjord, G., Hamberg, K., Malker, H., Petersson, G.
- A short introduction to usability in online surveys; 2006; Kaczmirek, L.
- Measuring task-specific perceptions of the world wide web ; 2006; Page-Thomas, K.
- Oversurveying: Causes, Consequences, and Cures; 2006; Weiner, S. P., Dalessio, A. T.
- Online Reporting: Real Time, Real Impact, Real Opportunities ; 2006; Barbera, K. M., Young, S.
- Online Surveys: Critical Issues in Using the Web to Conduct Surveys; 2006; Fenlason, K., Suckow-Zimberg, K.
- Getting Action from Organizational Surveys: New Concepts, Technologies, and Applications; 2006; Kraut, A. I.
- Survey Methodology; 2006; Nusser, S. M.
- Web-based survey techniques. A synthesis of Transit practice; 2006
- Web 2.0 & panels. The shift from lectures to conversations; 2006; Cook, M., Buckley, N.
- Understanding people. Sample matching; 2006; Rivers, D.
- The power of the visible: Visual design for Web surveys; 2006; Couper, M. P.
- The internet response method: Impact on the Canadian Census of population data; 2006; Roy, L., Laroche, D.
- The effect of conditioning when re-interviewing; 2006; Cartwright, T., Nancarrow, C.
- The anonymous elect. Market research through online access panels; 2006; Postoaca, A.
- Statistics for real-life sample surveys: non-simple-random samples and weighted data; 2006; Dorofeev, S., Grant, P.
- Sample matching. Representative sampling from Internet panels; 2006; Rivers, D.
- Research quality: The next MR industry challenge; 2006; Dedeker, K.
- Optimizing quality in the use of web-based and computer based testing for personnel selection; 2006; Hornke, L. F., Kersting, M.
- Online marketing research; 2006; Miller, J.
- Need for high quality auxiliary data service for improving the quality of editing and imputation...; 2006; Laaksonen, S.
- Microsoft sues testing material vendors; 2006; Johnston, S. J.
- Introduction to the Special Issue on the ITC - Guidelines on Computer-Based and Internet-Delivered Testing...; 2006; Coyne, I., Bartram, D.
- International Guidelines on Computer-Based and Internet-Delivered Testing; 2006
- How successful I am depends on what number I get: The effects of numerical scale labels and need for...; 2006; Yan, T.
- Greenfield unveils real-time sampling; 2006
- Global market research 2006; 2006
- F-Shaped pattern for reading web content; 2006; Nielsen, J.
- Blocked versus randomized format of questionnaires. A confirmatory multigroup analysis; 2006; Sparfeldt, J. R., Schilling, S. R., Rost, D. H., Rost, D. H., Thiel, A.
- Benefits and challenges of multi-sourcing. Understanding differences between sample sources; 2006; de Gaudemar, O.
- Behavioral self-report measures. International extensions; 2006; Thomas, R. K., Klein, J. D.
- Attitudinal differences. Comparing people who belong to multiple versus single panels; 2006; Casdas, D., Fine, B., Menictas, C.
- Assessing individual respondents' quality. An innovative scoring system; 2006; Loeb, C.,Hartmann, A.
- Assessing Panel Bias in the Knowledge Networks Panel: Updated Results from 2005 Research ; 2006; Pineau, V., Nukulkij, P., Tang, X.
- A Critical Assessment of Online Survey Tools; 2006; Marra, R. M., Bogue, B.
- A dynamic technique for conducting online survey-based research; 2006; Bonometti, R. J., Tang, J.
- The 2006 Confirmit Annual MR Software Survey; 2006; Macer, T., Wilson, S.
- Online community survey: an effectiveness measure for revealing citizen preferences in their role as...; 2006; Martin Juanil, D., Ismail, M.
- Blaise – Alive and kicking for 20 years; 2006; Bethlehem, J., Hofman, L.
- Physical or Virtual Presence of the Experimenter: Psychological Online-Experiments in Different Settings...; 2006; Ollesch, H., Heineken, E., Schulte, F. P.